She will repost every damn thing that runs across her page, without hesitation, and without ever bothering to do some of her own investigation. I hesitate to say a cause, because the people I encounter, that defend everything from their candidate of choice, generally don't know shit about much of what they either defend or bitch about. Yes, it's called blind loyalty.to something. There are those people on both sides of the political spectrum. However.the Defenders defend every goddamn word that comes out of his mouth.
#Youtube the professor vs trash talker license#
A badge is not a license to threaten violence. In simple terms, a badge is not a license to violate the rights of others. Laws that allow infringing on the rights of others are not Constitutionally valid in the United States. We need to remind ourselves that the United States is governed by rights and not governed by the rule of law. That's supposed to be the purpose of law and the purpose of enforcing law in the United States. We should be reminding ourselves (and law enforcement) that the duty of police is to protect our rights. But allowing that outrage to justify violating the rights of others should also result in condemnation. Violence and murder are violations of rights that should cause outrage. Is the guy in the video mocking the killing of a man or is the guy in the video mocking self righteous outrage? The guy in the video could just as easily be expressing his own self righteous outrage from his subjective point of view.Īs I pointed out, George Floyd was killed by one cop not by a police department, not by systemic racism, and not by Confederate statues. But that self righteous outrage is only valid within a subjective point of view. The video really does represent a competition between self righteous outrage. Taking offense is relative and subjective, isn't it? Outrage and offense can result from something as simple as a comment, as you have aptly illustrated. My first comment was intended to cause outrage and attract attention. I agree that being offended is not a right.but when I see someone mocking the death of another, am I just supposed to shrug my shoulders and ignore it? You certainly didn't clarify that with your first comment. Is there a reason for it? Is it because you know he's offending someone or that you think the pussy-hat wearing liberals are going to take to the streets and cry in anguish? Supporters can at least sit back and say "yeah, that ain't right" whenever the Chicken Shit Coward in Chief opens his mouth and inserts his foot. ***Defenders are different from supporters. There were college students who were doing some stupid "challenge" or another and kneeling on each other's neck and snapping photos of it. This is not the only time someone has mocked the death of George Floyd. I really don't have much else to say except that this truly turns my stomach that in 2020 people are still bigots. And people wonder why we Anti-Trumpers think Trump Defenders*** are racists and bigots. Which brings us back to trash cans.Disgusting. Safiya Noble, a professor of gender studies at UCLA and author of Algorithms of Oppression observed in an interview with New York magazine that they “function as powerful socialization tools, and teach people, in particular children, about the role of women, girls, and people who are gendered female to respond on demand.” These products also send a powerful message.
(File that under unpaid labor and mental load.) Siri looks up phone numbers or tracks down information, just as an administrative assistant-or secretary-might.
People ask Alexa to remind them of doctor’s appointments or to pick up a birthday gift for a child’s classmate-all tasks that, frustratingly, usually fall to women and especially mothers. The problem with that move was that “the work that these devices are intended to do” is gendered, Yolande Strengers, an associate professor of digital technology and society at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, told The New York Times.
0 kommentar(er)
